Two's company, Three's a crowd
Perhaps the old saying: "Two's company, three's a crowd", was simply a quick excuse that someone pulled out of thin air to keep someone out of the loop.
It's really quite possible that the trendsetter at the time, didn't want their precious loop to be weakened by a bronze chain and kept them out by saying "two's company, three's a crowd, sorry" + smirk.
Now the bronze chain probably accepted this and their fate that they would never be part of the loop, that they simply were the mouse who could sink the boat.
But if you look at the phrase more closely, who's perspective is this from? Who's the company of who?
In my opinion this is from Person A's point of view, and really if it's said correctly it means that Person B and C are company of Person A. But if Person D tags along, then THAT would be crowd.
Think about it, talking in a group of three generally makes a much more equal conversation that if there was a group of four.
In a group of three's for everyone to be included no one can pair off, but in a group of four it's much easier to create two smaller groups and become unwittingly socially segregated.
So how many people are part of this company, and therefore how many make a crowd?
It's a lot like this riddle: There are two ducks in front, two ducks behind and one in the middle, how many ducks are there?
It's really quite possible that the trendsetter at the time, didn't want their precious loop to be weakened by a bronze chain and kept them out by saying "two's company, three's a crowd, sorry" + smirk.
Now the bronze chain probably accepted this and their fate that they would never be part of the loop, that they simply were the mouse who could sink the boat.
But if you look at the phrase more closely, who's perspective is this from? Who's the company of who?
In my opinion this is from Person A's point of view, and really if it's said correctly it means that Person B and C are company of Person A. But if Person D tags along, then THAT would be crowd.
Think about it, talking in a group of three generally makes a much more equal conversation that if there was a group of four.
In a group of three's for everyone to be included no one can pair off, but in a group of four it's much easier to create two smaller groups and become unwittingly socially segregated.
So how many people are part of this company, and therefore how many make a crowd?
It's a lot like this riddle: There are two ducks in front, two ducks behind and one in the middle, how many ducks are there?
5
Labels: clique, ducks, excluding, including, loop, perspective, three, two